Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinkism

Old discussion from VfD

Discussion concluded on June 1, 2004

Note: There are remnants of other VfD discussions in page history. jni 07:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity. No Alexa data [1] [2], no indication on website that there are any other members of this "art movement" besides David Kam. - Hephaestos|§ 20:43, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

"Vanity" barely covers it, in my humble opinion. It's on the borderline of patent nonsense and original research. This has gotta go, friends. - Lucky 6.9 21:54, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity. UninvitedCompany 23:21, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Quite explicitly unencyclopedic. Currently also listed as a copyvio, but more likely vanity IMO. (Unlikely to be both.) Either way delete. Andrewa 00:04, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reasons given above. Thue 10:24, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity or copyvio. Andris 22:45, May 31, 2004 (UTC)